Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics) |  | Author: Giorgio Agamben Creator: Daniel Heller-Roazen Publisher: Stanford University Press Category: Book
List Price: $21.95 Buy New: $18.11 as of 3/10/2010 00:54 CST details You Save: $3.84 (17%)
New (32) Used (19) from $16.05
Seller: thermite-media Rating: 16 reviews
Media: Paperback Edition: 1 Pages: 228 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6 Dimensions (in): 8.4 x 5.5 x 0.5
ISBN: 0804732183 Dewey Decimal Number: 320.011 EAN: 9780804732185
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Features:
|
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
The work of Giorgio Agamben, one of Italy’s most important and original philosophers, has been based on an uncommon erudition in classical traditions of philosophy and rhetoric, the grammarians of late antiquity, Christian theology, and modern philosophy. Recently, Agamben has begun to direct his thinking to the constitution of the social and to some concrete, ethico-political conclusions concerning the state of society today, and the place of the individual within it.
In Homo Sacer, Agamben aims to connect the problem of pure possibility, potentiality, and power with the problem of political and social ethics in a context where the latter has lost its previous religious, metaphysical, and cultural grounding. Taking his cue from Foucault’s fragmentary analysis of biopolitics, Agamben probes with great breadth, intensity, and acuteness the covert or implicit presence of an idea of biopolitics in the history of traditional political theory. He argues that from the earliest treatises of political theory, notably in Aristotle’s notion of man as a political animal, and throughout the history of Western thinking about sovereignty (whether of the king or the state), a notion of sovereignty as power over “life” is implicit.
The reason it remains merely implicit has to do, according to Agamben, with the way the sacred, or the idea of sacrality, becomes indissociable from the idea of sovereignty. Drawing upon Carl Schmitt’s idea of the sovereign’s status as the exception to the rules he safeguards, and on anthropological research that reveals the close interlinking of the sacred and the taboo, Agamben defines the sacred person as one who can be killed and yet not sacrificed—a paradox he sees as operative in the status of the modern individual living in a system that exerts control over the collective “naked life” of all individuals.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 16
Shorter articles by Agamben December 10, 1999 22 out of 24 found this review helpful
I'm responding to the reader from Korea below who requested a more concise explanation of why the homo sacer can be killed but not sacrificed. I haven't read this book, but I have read two articles ("Form-of-Life" and "Beyond Human Rights") by Agamben in the collection edited by Paolo Virno and Michael Hardt called Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics (University of Minnesota Press, 1996). These are excellent, concise articles which I recommend without reservation, and may be a good introduction to the "homo sacer."Agamben writes: "Inasmuch as the refugee, an apparently marginal figure, unhinges the old trinity of State-nation-territory, it deserves instead to be regarded as the central figure of our political history. We should not forget that the first camps were built in Europe as spaces for controlling refugees, and that the succession of internment camps - concentration camps - extermination camps represents a perfectly real filiation. One of the few rules the Nazis constantly obeyed throughout the course of the 'final solution' was that Jews and Gypsies could be sent to extermination camps only after having been fully denationalized (that is, after they had been stripped of even that second-class citizenship to which they had been relegated after the Nuremberg laws). When their rights are no longer the rights of the citizen, that is when humans are tuly sacred, in the sense that this term used to have in ancient Roman law: doomed to death."
On the consequence of the split between Bios and Zoe May 2, 2004 Sagan Lazar (In yo monitor) 37 out of 43 found this review helpful
The obscurity embedded in the Roman Law that declared one who was condemned to death "sacred" is never really clarified here. It is better and more succinctly described in _Means Without Ends_. In this is book, Agamben soberly traces the origin of the single most deracinating event in human history: the Holocaust. Soberly, because Agamben sees the Holocaust not as an anomaly, but as an unavoidable consequence given the political origin of the West. But this book is not so much about the Holocaust per se, but about the various historical interventions concerning the notion of the Sovereign that wove the matrix of Western politics into what it became capable of in the 20th century. The locus of Agamben's view of modernity is the (concentration) camp. Agamben stresses the fact that the camp is not only a place where the unspeakable takes place but more importantly and fundamentally where a human being is stripped "Naked", stripped of 'bios' and exposed as mere 'zoe', such that anything--including the unspeakable--CAN be done to him since nothing could be considered a criminal act. The camp, according to Agamben, is "the space that opens up when the state of exception starts to become the rule." Agamben argues that the camp is the new biopolitical NOMOS of the planet by connecting the dots that Carl Schmitt first drew but left unconnected. Closer to the homefront, Agamben's meditation ultimately takes us to see the totalitarian implications behind those "gated communities" in the US today, and the impossibility of dying without the State's approval. If a good life is hinged on the hope of a good death, should the State define and decide who shall get "good death" (euthanasia)?
Homo Sacer is a must read. June 5, 2006 Scott Odekirk (pocatello, idaho) 4 out of 6 found this review helpful
Agamben's best known work lives up to the hype. One of the most powerful aspects of this book is its shocking predictions about the world to come. Published many years before the initiation of the war on terror, Agamben signals the beginning the of a style of governance built on permanent exception. He insists that the extermination of the Jewx by the Nazis was not simply a horrible enigma that should never return, rather biopolitical atrocities have continued to intensify. This book is a must read for any person interested in understanding how the deep seated structure of sovereignty and its spatio-temporal course through power relations have brought us to the seeming limit poit of exception become rule. A handbook for contemporary politics. This is a great book.
Agamben on the Politics of "Life" June 29, 2009 Tony See (Singapore, Switzerland, Shanghai) This is a must read for any serious student of philosophy, political theory, jurisprudence and international studies. Agamben here displays his mastery of the Greek, Roman, Judaic and modern traditions through his insight into the very heart of our modern understanding of the term "life."
Using a genealogical method, he traces our understanding of "life" back to a break between "bios" and "zoe" itself, a break that is to lead step-by-step, through a series of historical accidents and judicial decisions, eventually to genocide, concentration camps and the Jewish Holocaust in WWII. Believe it or not the roots of this human tragedy can be traced back to as early as Roman antiquity - a point that would have definitely made Heidegger raise his eyebrows.
This has special significance in relation to the thoughts of Heidegger and Arendt and should provide a shock to those who still, despite our current political and economic crisis, believe that we live in an age of progress and Enlightenment.
Practical post-modernism June 1, 2003 2 out of 19 found this review helpful
This book is almost perfect. Agamben discusses facts that no one else does. And puts it all in a sober Lacanian package that any self-respecting theorist will have to admire. He is literally the new Foucault.I have one reservation. That's on his conclusion that the world has become a death camp. When it comes to the political sacred, this is mostly right on. But the world is going to look a lot more like the kind of camp through which the subhumans of World War II were processed when the religious sacred catches up....
Showing reviews 1-5 of 16
|
|
|
|